What is the difference between lion and snow leopard os




















Early updates to Snow Leopard were packed with fixes to a long list of bugs. Time heals all wounds, right? In February , this tweet made an astute prediction:. I'm sure that five years from now we'll look back and realise that Snow Leopard was the best version of OS X.

In , Computerworld attempted to sum up why Snow Leopard was still so popular with Mac users. After OS X Lion, Apple began releasing a major new version of OS X every year, straining the resources of the Mac team and setting a precedent for customers who would begin to expect significant improvements year over year.

The piece resonated with a community of frustrated Apple customers. The piece inspired countless follow-up articles from other voices in the community, many echoing the same sentiment. In February , 9to5Mac reported that Apple was planning a focus on stability and performance in iOS 9 — a story that sounds very familiar to the recent reports about iOS Comparisons to Snow Leopard were once again drawn. Over the past two years, the legend of Snow Leopard has steadily grown, its mythology spreading with every new discussion about Apple software.

Snow Leopard has now reached meme status, the punchline of jokes on Twitter :. Rosetta support is no longer provided with Mountain Lion. Do you need to sync with an iPhone? If so, which version of iTunes do you need to work with the iOS in the iPhone? Latest version of iTunes One needs to run iTunes What the difference between Snow leopard and Mountain Lion? Depends on what you use your Mac for. And so it goes. It still offers bit processing, and with Apple's tight control over Mac hardware components, there's no reason to anticipate a learning curve like Microsoft's partners had to deal with when Vista upended the Windows driver model.

Still, the version of iTunes that ships with Lion supports bit processing for the first time. We also wonder about any performance impact from Lion's new auto-versioning feature. There's also the question of how well third-party programs will make the transition in these early days, since they might still be awaiting optimization.

With the 3. For the most part, we found only minor speed variations between the two operating systems. Lion seemed a touch slower in our Photoshop CS5 batch processing test, but it also has a similarly small edge in iTunes encoding. We can't explain the variations with certainty, but it seems that iTunes does indeed benefit from the shift to bit support. For Photoshop CS5, which does not yet support Lion's versioning capability, the performance dip could come from background code tied to versioning, or perhaps it's simply an optimization issue.

Although the performance deltas on both iTunes and Photoshop exceed our 5 percent threshold for statistical relevance, neither is that dramatic.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000