What is the difference between canada and australia

Gold rushes beginning in the s brought thousands of new immigrants to New South Wales and Victoria, helping to reorient Australia away from its penal colony roots. In the second half of the s, the colonies were all gradually granted self-government, and in , they federated and became the Commonwealth of Australia. Australia contributed more than , troops to allied efforts during World War I, and Australian troops played a large role in the defeat of Japanese troops in the Pacific in World War II.

In recent decades, Australia has become an internationally competitive, advanced market economy due in large part to economic reforms adopted in the s and its proximity to East and Southeast Asia. In the early s, Australian politics became unstable with frequent attempts to oust party leaders, including five changes of prime minister between and As a result, both major parties instituted rules to make it harder to remove a party leader.

Irrigated land 8, sq km 25, sq km Natural hazards. Population distribution vast majority of Canadians are positioned in a discontinuous band within approximately km of the southern border with the United States; the most populated province is Ontario, followed by Quebec and British Columbia population is primarily located on the periphery, with the highest concentration of people residing in the east and southeast; a secondary population center is located in and around Perth in the west; of the States and Territories, New South Wales has, by far, the largest population; the interior, or "outback", has a very sparse population Demographics Canada Australia Population 37,, July est.

Age structure years: Median age total: Population growth rate 0. Birth rate Death rate 8. Net migration rate 5.

Sex ratio at birth: 1. Infant mortality rate total: 4. Life expectancy at birth total population: Total fertility rate 1.

Protestant English The World Factbook, une source indispensable d'informations de base. French English Step 1: You must verify your eligibility criteria. You may register with a Job Bank non-compulsory. Step 4: You must provide a medical and police clearance certificate. Step 4: Submit a Registration of Interest You will be selected if you meet all the eligibility requirements. Step 5: You may apply for the Provincial Nomination Program.

Step 7: Submit your visa application to the Department of Home Affairs within 60 days Step 8: Provide your passport and other documents for the visa stamping process. Step 8: Receive your visa. Citizen Benefits Yes Yes Free education, social security services, free healthcare facilities, etc. Recommended Posts Awesome information your visitors need, just a click away. Migrate Canada Vs. Both these Ask a Question. Call Us - Mail us - info kansaz. Flexible Skilled Immigration Policies.

Access to New Zealand. Good Labour Market. Public Education. Low-Cost Accommodation. Better Economy. Ideal Family Settings. Organized Immigration Procedure. Lower Interest Rate. Easy PR System. Cars are relatively cheaper in Canada. Interest Rate. Banking interest rates are lower in Canada. Canada has a diversified labour market. The weather in Canada can be quite cold.

Privileges and Rights. The rights and privileges for immigrants are well-constructed in Canada. Liveable Aspects. It is ideal for families. Better Community. Slightly more tolerant of new immigrants. Geographical Assets. Filled with beautiful mountains. Public Transport monthly. House Rent — 1 to 3 BHK. Canada PR. Australia PR. The primary applicant must be 18 years old. The age of the immigrants must be within 45 years.

You should score 65 points in the selection exam. You need to have a month work experience. You must have an educational degree.

You would require a globally-acknowledged educational degree. The candidate should provide fund-related paperwork. You must have a decent CRS score.

Referral letter from your employer. It honestly took me almost a year to get confident driving on the other side of the road.

Also, Canada has some crazy road rules that are so foreign to us Aussies! This is all well and good until two people arrive at the same time! I still hate these silly inventions. You can turn right on a red light: Essentially this is just the same as turning left on a green arrow in Oz.

I guess it feels slightly more rebellious because we are going on a red light; do you feel me?! You honestly have no idea how hard this is until you have to start doing it. As Aussies, we have been programmed our entire lives to do one this, so trying to change a life long habit is actually pretty difficult!

I truly believed that moving to a fellow english speaking country, I would blend right in; not the case. I would be rich if I have a dollar for every time that I said a word that Canadians had never heard of, and vice versa. Here is some of my favourite differences word-wise between Canada and Australia.

All in all, being an Aussie Expat in Canada has been a once in a life opportunity that I would never take back. Canadians are a crazy but kind bunch and I am so glad that I get to spend my time living abroad here! Are you currently an Expat in Canada? Or are you planning the move abroad to Canada soon? Let me know below the major differences between Oz and Canada that you have noticed!

Chelsea is an Aussie Expat currently located in Toronto, Canada. Her main goal in life is to explore as much of the world as possible and have no regrets. The thought of simply living to pay bills and do nothing fun drives her crazy. And love that you listed the difference in Canadian lingo and Aussie lingo. What a fun experience to see such different worlds! What a fun article to read. I guess we really do things differently in different countries.

Yes, there is lots of similarities between Canada and USA for sure! The milk is a strange one! I thought the same when we traveled to London.

The language barrier was shocking. But, it is always fun learning a few new words. I always get confused about that here! It sounds like Canada is similar to the United States. I remember going to England and being so scared driving on the opposite side of the road we were use to! It was a great novelty for us coming from Australia , when we 1st touched down in Vancouver.

OMG I am sure this must have been a very huge adjustment for you! I moved abroad in from the US to the Czech Republic. It was quite an adjustment but not like this! Way to stay strong. Finding similarities and differences is one of my favorite things about travel and living abroad. Your experience is not too dissimilar to mine moving from the United States to London. Though we speak the same language, there are quite a few differences in the way we do things.

My favorite part is your Australian coat in Canada. I am sure the weather is quite different! Great post. Yes, I think our experiences would be very similar! Hahaha, the coat was a killer! Love this!! I want to visit Canada so bad. Canada officially became a multicultural nation in Multiculturalism was conceived as a way of reconciling the identity conflicts between English speaking Canadians, French speaking Canadians and Canadians that spoke neither language.

In practice, multiculturalism hasn't been applied equally. The English speaking Canadians have been expected to give up their own national identity and embrace 'multicultural supporter' as their identity.

This basically means championing multiculturalism and criticising America. Unlike the English, the French speakers have been assertive in declaring that multiculturalism is not acceptable for them.

In , the provincial government of Quebec was firmly committed to the assimilation of migrants and disregards the central government's policy of multiculturalism. In , sociologists Gerard Bouchard and philosopher Charles Taylor explained why multiculturalism was not suitable.

According to the sociologists :. The third "group", the non-English and non-French, have tended to retain the identity of their origin. In a nutshell, the English speakers are multicultural, the French speakers are French Canadian and the others either have a foreign or indigenous identity.

In their own way, each group has benefited and lost as a result of multiculturalism. The French speakers have been allowed to preserve their strong culture and individuals from the culture receive the benefits that culture provides.

The English speakers have been able to give up their cultures and so have become the most adaptable to change and the most individually free. As for the minorities, they get a minority identity, which they may or may not be happy with. Some minorities definitely aren't happy with it. For example, Neil Bissoondath , a Canadian man born in Trinidad and Tobago, has argued that official multiculturalism limits the freedom of minorities by confining them to cultural and geographic ghettos.

Indeed, Canada has never produced a Barrack Obama style politician because, under Canadian multiculturalism, a man like Obama would be encouraged to go away and play bongo drums at a multicultural festival. Australia officially became a multicultural nation in A bit like Canada, English speakers were expected to have "multicultural supporter" as their identity, migrants were expected to hold on to their ancestral identity and Aborigines were expected to preserve their cultures.

In practice, things have turned out a little different to Canada. Furthermore, they have taken a more active role in Australian politics, sport and business. It is only in the cultural industries and the humanities where Australia has remained largely an all-white brotherhood with little representation by non-whites.

Failure of ethnics and non-whites to gain representation on Australian television or in movies can be attributed to the policy of multiculturalism. On the flip side, if a casting director puts a non-white into a generic role, the director risks being accused of trying to assimilate non-whites.

Film producer Jeff Puser criticised the role as:. Non-whites are also conspicuous by their absence from the humanities. This was seen in a survey of intellectuals by the Australian Public Intellectual Network. The survey asked scholars to list 10 important and influential thinkers. The list they produced had 8 white men in the 10 most influential Australian intellectuals. Men occupied 17 of the top 20 places. The problem for ethnics and non-whites is that they are excluded from the moral empowerment of the activist campaigns.

Because ethnics are stereotyped as victims by the humanities, if they get involved in the self-flagellation campaigns of the humanities, they are seen as a "victim" having a whinge, instead of a "perpetrator" showing moral courage. This makes them outsiders with little moral status.

Furthermore, they get sympathy but they don't get respect. Some members of the humanities have noted how the self-flagellation moralities combined with the use of words such as "we" have effectively excluded non-whites.

While multiculturalism is still accepted today, long term it is unlikely to survive. Recent trends in Australia are more like those seen in America, Holland and Denmark which have sought to place a national identity over a multicultural identity. In , Liberal politician Andrew Robb argued that "A community of separate cultures fosters a rights mentality, rather than a responsibilities mentality. In , the Liberal government changed the name of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs to the Department of Immigration and Citizenship.

It has been rare for Australian Aborigines to align themselves with non-ethnic Australians in order to achieve their political objectives. On the other hand, Canadian Aborigines have developed a shared victim identity with other ethnic Canadians. Indigenous politics are also configured differently. Australian indigenous peoples have distanced themselves from multiculturalism, which they see as being defined in terms of cultures of migration.

At times, there have been unfortunate alliances between right-wingers fulminating against Asian immigration, elements in the green movement who speak of sustainable population, and some Aboriginal activists. On the other hand, Aboriginal activists have also expressed understandable and substantiated fears that discussion of multiculturalism can distract attention from the issue of land rights.

By contrast, in Canada there appear to have been more frequent alliances among indigenous and ethnic groups, which have been united especially by the fact that both are targets of racism by virtue of their status as 'visible minorities'. Even though Aborigines have been reluctant to form alliances with migrants, the Australian government has tried to facilitate alliances between the two.

The government department that controls Aboriginal issues is the same department that controls migrant issues. Funding and media releases have been used to create a sense of affinity between the two and to prevent either political interest developing agendas in contradiction with the other.

In the academic sphere, funding has also contrived to create a culture that stereotypes migrants and Aborigines as victims persecuted by the white Australian community of British descent. More accurately, the academics stereotype the groups as being persecuted by "we" white Australians of British descent.

Popular culture over the last years provides food for thought on why Australian Aborigines have often aligned themselves with anglo Australians instead of non-anglo Australians.

Traditional nationalism in Australia has positioned the bush as the representative of the Australian identity. For example, in the 19th century, the nationalistic song Waltzing Matilda built a sense of national pride with Aboriginal words like coolibah, billabong and jumbuck.

Right up until the s, those who positioned the bush as representative of the Australian identity continued to use Aborigines to affirm the status of the bush.